Hacker News
new
|
past
|
comments
|
ask
|
show
|
jobs
|
submit
login
oh_sigh
on June 23, 2015
|
parent
|
context
|
favorite
| on:
Lush cosmetics in YouTube address dispute
They probably don't want to set a precedent of doing this. For example, if BMW wants youtube.com/beemer, but frank beemer has had it for years, they probably don't want a precedent where poor Frankie gets to keep it.
grrowl
on June 23, 2015
[–]
Lush pays for their YouTube features and for ads, Matthew Lush does not.
Guidelines
|
FAQ
|
Lists
|
API
|
Security
|
Legal
|
Apply to YC
|
Contact
Search: