Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

It's just odd that they're willing to pay money instead of doing the tiny change.


They probably don't want to set a precedent of doing this. For example, if BMW wants youtube.com/beemer, but frank beemer has had it for years, they probably don't want a precedent where poor Frankie gets to keep it.


Lush pays for their YouTube features and for ads, Matthew Lush does not.


Agreed, unless they got a significant amount of money to change the URL in the first place...in which case paying for marketing materials would most likely be a drop in the bucket.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: