Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

One can easily estimate the cost of a query in a relational database via EXPLAIN.

What relational databases do is decouple such implementation details from semantics, enabling higher levels of abstraction and therefore reasoning. Similarly, I'm happy to abstract the low-levels details of dictionaries in Python and not code my own hash table from scratch, or to use a compiler and not write assembly language. And while there are inevitable corner cases where hand-coded logic will outperform what a system can guess, handicapping yourself for a few extra cycles is something routinely (and rightly) derided in most programming circles.

Nobody debates that NoSQL systems are great for hand-tuning corner cases like these. It's the idea that they are a viable alternative to the relational model that is so objectionable, as it's a step backwards in abstraction.



Sorry my comment wasn't meant to be construed as an attack on the usefulness SQL, rather it was defending the usefulness of CouchDB.

Not all applications need the powerful abstraction of SQL. Many do and _many_ don't.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: