Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Your "argument" doesn't answer isomorphic's point, nor makes any sense even on its own. The second option of your false choice is, if anything, an ideal of anarchism (which is what some people in the past or outside of America mean by "libertarianism"), not American Libertarianism. Private property, perhaps the most sacred of American Libertarian tenets, is entirely dependent on being enshrined by law and enforced by violence.

Another most sacred American Libertarian tenet is the notion of personal responsibility and credit, that each of us in a free market is solely and entirely to blame for our poverty and deserve all the profit and wealth we obtain, that in a free society society is not responsible for our personal condition nor us for society's. How does the importance you give to "when in-grained into society" in your straw-man setup jive with that?

Perhaps the important distinction you missed is "American Libertarianism", as opposed to libertarianism in general, which runs the gamut from Ayn Randian worship of selfishness, laissez-faire capitalism and strong private property rights to libertarian socialism and Libertarian Marxism.



I did not note the "American" part of "American Libertarianism".

I'll walk back to the anarchy camp.

Public benefits can be shared more efficiently and more benevolently by a government around the corner than by one thousands of kilometres away hiding behind lines of police, security guards and lobbyists.

I'm just going to leave this here.

"Footage shows homeless black man Milton Hall being shot at 46 times by police in the US" http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/footage-sho...




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: