Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Yeah I love FreeBSD. I wish more people gave it a chance before rushing to ZFS FUSE. Granted things are a little different now that ZoL is around and has proven to be stable, but it always struck me as a little odd that some would point blank refuse to even try FreeBSD yet welcome the lesser tested and poorer performing solution of running ZFS in FUSE. But each to their own I guess.


I was one of the people who rushed to do a ZFS setup on Ubuntu when those capabilities first started appearing ~5 or so years ago. There were some strange bugs that pushed me onto BSD, and the entire time since then since then I've been so stable it almost makes me nervous to try again despite the positive reception of modern ZOL (if it aint broke etc). Seriously, impressively stable.


If you haven't seen it already, this post by the same author about the State of ZFS on Linux might interest you: https://clusterhq.com/blog/state-zfs-on-linux/


I've read it, but thanks for the breadcrumb. It definitely seeded thoughts in my head about giving it another try the next time I do a clean reformat on my fileserver.


Is ZFS in FUSE is a thing anymore, with the "native" port from zfsonlinux.org?


Development of ZFS-FUSE ceased a few years ago when ZFSOnLinux surpassed it. That said, ZFSOnLinux will likely implement an option to build a FUSE driver in the future, but it is not a priority:

https://github.com/zfsonlinux/zfs/issues/8


I'm not sure to be honest. But their site (zfs-fuse.net) seems to be down for me.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: