There is a serious lack of women in the tech industry, and it isn't (as some in the slashdot comments suggest) solvable just by encouraging that companies hire more women. Companies can't hire more women if there simply aren't that many women applying because they don't exist in the field. Encouraging more women to get into the tech industry at a young age is the right approach, IMO.
I don't see how this is anything but discriminatory. If you look at the stats, boys are falling behind in nearly every area, in terms of levels of achievement. Taking away incentives for them in the one area they tend to do well is discrimination, plain and simple.
"I'm concerned that boys have become politically incorrect, that we are a society in the process of turning against its male children." - Christina Hoff Sommers
I personally have been a mentor for a three sets of boys over the last three semesters at Spark (http://sparkprogram.org/) and have seen firsthand the positive experiences boys can have when they learn they can be creators, and not just consumers. To take away that creative spirit from boys is a crime, and I cannot see myself supporting any nonprofit initiative that discriminates in such a manner.
I have never heard anyone tell a female that they won't succeed in STEM subjects.
I hear a lot (relatively) about encouraging more women into tech. Why? So they train up and decide they don't like it after a couple of years and quit?
There is a serious lack of women in the tech industry, and it isn't (as some in the slashdot comments suggest) solvable just by encouraging that companies hire more women. Companies can't hire more women if there simply aren't that many women applying because they don't exist in the field. Encouraging more women to get into the tech industry at a young age is the right approach, IMO.