Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Can someone explain how does one gets a job after inflicting so much public damage on his previous workplace?


Before I answer this, let me state that I'm a tactician, not a judge or a god. I don't know who's right and wrong in this mess, nor who's good and who's bad.

Can someone explain how does one gets a job after inflicting so much public damage on his previous workplace?

It's hard. She may need a professional to rework her public image (even if her account is 100% accurate) and she'll want to settle for positive reference (i.e. not sue Github, agree to a non-disparagement contract in which they publicly state that she was an excellent employee, and that they've terminated all responsible parties-- if the truth is that no one did anything wrong, then they don't terminate anyone and that statement's vacuously true). She might want to brand herself as an authority on workplace harassment and on what light-management cultures need to do to protect themselves from bullying, and maybe consult for a little while on how to make tech companies more accepting of women. All the while, she'll have to paint a positive image of Github, even if she dislikes the place (and may have a reason to). It'll probably be 4-5 years before she can get conventional employment at an appropriate professional level.

At this point, she's made some serious tactical mistakes. For example, mentioning the hula nonincident dilutes/weakens her case dramatically. The bit about the founder's wife (if true) is utterly damning. The hula hoop? People stare at anything out of the ordinary. If it were men flying quadcopters, there'd be a group of people hanging to watch. Not sexist. When you take a story of someone (or a company) doing bad and flower it with irrelevant petty insults (they employ guys who stare at women!) it actually undermines the case that one is trying to make.

If she can get Github to come out with a public story that makes her look good but also saves its face, that's what she wants. She shouldn't play for cash IMO. Considering taxes, attorney contingency, and the high risk that she doesn't get anything, she's better off putting her energy into getting her reputation fixed. Reputation repair and lawsuits are both exhausting processes that may conflict and certainly compete for one's time and energy, and so it's hard to do both.


What's Adria Richards up to these days? That's an ideal case study.


She claims she already has a new job to go to. I have to wonder, though, whether that is still the case after she talked to TechCrunch.


Horvath mentioned on Twitter they supported her coming forward about her experience:

  nrrrdcore: I'm thrilled to be joining a new team in just
  a few weeks and they completely support me coming forward.
https://twitter.com/nrrrdcore/status/444881221865054208




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: