Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

> I think it is difficult to say that Github is at fault from the information given, and I fear that's the conclusion that many were jumping to.

Don't worry. Read the whole thread on this discussion. The only people who are jumping to conclusions are those assuming there is something wrong with Horvath's story.

I have thought carefully about the article, and this is my conclusion: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=7408446 Reproduced here:

> GitHub are perfectly capable of defending themselves. They are the group in power here. Second-guessing the motives and truth of this woman's story does nothing but undermine her, and undermine the confidence of others who may have similar stories (at GitHub or elsewhere).



> Second-guessing the motives and truth of this woman's story does nothing but undermine her, and undermine the confidence of others who may have similar stories (at GitHub or elsewhere).

What the heck are you talking about? The story is hearsay at this point and armchair warriors are jumping to conclusions behind the anonymity of the internet.

Second-guessing the motives and truth? Do you work at Github? Is this person your co-worker?


The story is, by definition, not hearsay, since the woman is alleging that the events took place with her present.

Key point: she alleges that everyone was not calm and cool regarding hitting on a coworker. You miss the part where he didn't leave when asked, and never justified reverting her commits (to the point where she had to revert the revert).


Two things, being in power makes you more vulnerable to these things and secondly, you should second guess everyone, people look after their own interests and no one is completely reliable.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: