Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

What was that ICANN arbitration decision that said that law enforcement requests are not enough, that there must be a court order? Who was the registrar that went to bat for the site owner?


Perhaps you're thinking of EasyDNS?

http://domainincite.com/15538-cops-cant-block-domain-transfe...

From the arbitration decision:

"Although there are compelling reasons why the request from a recognized law enforcement agency such as the City of London Police should be honored, the Transfer Policy is unambiguous in requiring a court order before a Registrar of Record may deny a request to transfer a domain name… The term “court order” is unambiguous and cannot be interpreted to be the equivalent of suspicion of wrong doing by a policy agency.

To permit a registrar of record to withhold the transfer of a domain based on the suspicion of a law enforcement agency, without the intervention of a judicial body, opens the possibility for abuse by agencies far less reputable than the City of London Police."


ICANN should pull GoDaddy's domain rights since they aren't following ICANN rules.


This is a good question, I want to know what registrar this is, sounds like a great place to park domains.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: