Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Pedophiles do nasty things on the Internet. Uncovering pedophiles on the Internet is impossible without mass surveillance of the Internet. How do you suggest that one should go about proving that someone is a pedophile?

In both the case of pedophiles and state actors who are breaking the law, the answer is the same. Wait for them to slip up. It's hard to keep something secret forever.



I'm not on top of my criminal law, but it seems to me that the nasty, illegal things pedophiles do, they do in real life and not the internet, no?


We can replace pedophile with "person who consumes and distributes kiddie porn" if that helps the analogy.


If you replace those words, then your analogy falls apart.

http://falkvinge.net/2012/09/07/three-reasons-child-porn-mus...


> "Uncovering pedophiles on the Internet is impossible without mass surveillance of the Internet"

Didn't realize the TV show "To Catch a Predator" did mass surveillance of the internet, NBC is taking investigative journalism to an extreme.


That's sort of the point. When someone justifies an action because it's "impossible" to stop bad thing X without doing morally questionable thing Y, be skeptical.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: