"You can make up a new title if you want, but if you put gratuitous editorial spin on it, the editors may rewrite it. "
So you're just wrong on this. (For the record I did write a blog post on my blog but I wanted to share the link and didn't feel my post's expansion of the issue was as relevant as the initial article)
As far as it being funny I'm sorry but it is. Saying Google should be guilty of copyright infringement for crawling a website is ridiculous. If someone said it on Saturday Night Live it would get a huge laugh. Because it's comical
Hey, I just want to apologize. While I still think your title is wrong (er... it is a gratuitous editorial spin), when I woke up this morning I regretted writing in that tone while drunk. Not something that I would do face-to-face, I assure you... my bad.
"You can make up a new title if you want, but if you put gratuitous editorial spin on it, the editors may rewrite it. "
So you're just wrong on this. (For the record I did write a blog post on my blog but I wanted to share the link and didn't feel my post's expansion of the issue was as relevant as the initial article)
As far as it being funny I'm sorry but it is. Saying Google should be guilty of copyright infringement for crawling a website is ridiculous. If someone said it on Saturday Night Live it would get a huge laugh. Because it's comical
(For the record I'm not deaf to the MSM's issues and again posted my full thoughts on the issue here: http://www.tomstechblog.com/post/Searching-For-A-Solution-to...)