Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

I don't think Go could have existed in 1996. It feels like a reaction to Java, in some sense. And even if it was built, exactly as it is now, in 1996, it probably would have gone no where.

"It doesn't even have object inheritance! And what do we need all these concurrency things for? Windows has only had preemptive multitasking for a year, and multi-core is still a decade away."



Oberon and Oberon-2 were available in 1991, which Go takes the method syntax and package concepts from.

GC enabled system programming languages, which failed most likely due to the Pascal syntax.


Your second paragraph quotes a fictitious someone in 1996, right?


Haha, yes, thanks. I added quotes.


Well, Limbo existed in 1995, but it got nowhere…


Yeah not enough Object for 96, but still it feels like an old language to me.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: