Of course, Zach (or anyone) isn't alone in his views.
You're wrong here, though:
> Putting those two things together, I don't think it's fair to use words that imply that Zach is rejecting the author solely because the author's views undermine Zach's personal and unique viewpoint, introducing cognitive dissonance.
If a man wants to ban openly gay displays of affection, it's because he wants to play king. The fact that others share his sentiment is irrelevant.
Clearly, Zach isn't alone in his bullying views or attitudes, but it doesn't matter. If anything, it makes it worse.
You're wrong here, though:
> Putting those two things together, I don't think it's fair to use words that imply that Zach is rejecting the author solely because the author's views undermine Zach's personal and unique viewpoint, introducing cognitive dissonance.
If a man wants to ban openly gay displays of affection, it's because he wants to play king. The fact that others share his sentiment is irrelevant.
Clearly, Zach isn't alone in his bullying views or attitudes, but it doesn't matter. If anything, it makes it worse.