Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

>> It's possible to ask AI to write code and then read the code yourself

> Sure, but then it would not be vibecoding.

Wait, what?





Vibe-coding as originally defined (by Karpathy?) implied not reading the code at all, just trying it and pasting back any error codes; repeat ad infinitum until it works or you give up.

Now the term has evolved into "using AI in coding" (usually with a hint of non rigor/casualness), but that's not what it originally meant.


AI assisted coding/engineering becomes "vibe coding" when you decide to abdicate any understanding of what you are building, instead focusing only on the outcome

This feels like a silly semantics argument, but how is the outcome not what you are building?



Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: