Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Kids being banned from social media is just one side of the coin. _Everyone_ else being forced to KYC with random websites is the other. I can’t help but wonder, which of the two outcomes is the actual goal here.




It's wet dream of politicians that think the key to reducing crime is invigilation. So, that goal

I don't think there is all that many politicians gullible enough to think that kind of massive breach of privacy is a worthy tradeoff


So far I haven't been KYCd by anything.

Aside from YouTube I don't particularly engage with any of these often, but my Google, Facebook, Discord, Twitter, Bluesky, (current) Reddit, Slack, Telegram accounts all seem to be BAU without new requirements.

If the 80% of us currently holding unambiguously-over-16 accounts are exempt, and it only affects future over-16 users as they're onboarded, then it is a very blunt and very slow form of data harvesting which won't yield useful results until years/decades after all of the relevant decision-makers have moved on, retired and/or died. So this seems unlikely?


Nobody is forcing you to use facebook

You're right, but Social Media was one of the last places one could be critical of the Government whilst also being anonymous or pesudo-anonymous.



Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: