Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

No I mean we're in the same community, and perhaps next thing I do is I answer a related question on Stack Overflow that you or someone else can use. Everyone wins, including you, because by writing you also get to structure your thoughts better and perhaps discover some new way.

I mean the degree of use or exchange should matter.



The problem is that StackOverflow can rug-pull you (and the community) at any time.

Things that come to mind:

- adding 'account required' screens so information is harder to access

- harvesting/selling that ip without your explicit consent (although you agreed in the TCs)


I don't understand the issue.

I gave an example of where I'm using your info for my benefit in a different community.

Why does it matter that AI is in the same community, doesn't that actually help my argument because its information is more public?


I want to be part of a community of people. And for decades, that's what sharing information online one.

A third party coming in and saying "hey, everybody stop talking to each other, just talk to us and we'll intermediate and eventually replace every interaction between you, and charge money for it, and fill it up with advertising and eventual enshittification" is not aligned with my goals there at all.


Nostr is a place where we're trying to make that happen.

3rd parties can still come in and try to offer value. But they can not sit between your interactions as clients are interchangeable


That's not happening.

No one is forcing us to exclusively provide information to AI

AI isn't the sole source of information nor are you forced to use it.

The internet is already full of advertising and shit


> AI isn't the sole source of information nor are you forced to use it.

I mean, it's now embedded in all our search engines, so it's kind of hard to obtain information without invoking the hallucination-generating machine


So the problem is with search engines, not the communities they index.

Parent said:

> A third party coming in and saying "hey, everybody stop talking to each other, just talk to us and we'll intermediate and eventually replace every interaction between you, and charge money for it

which doesn't seem to be the case in forums and message boards.


So isn't that the real issue for you? It it wasn't being pushed so heavily would you care as much?

It's like pre installed apps or forced browsers, they cause a pushback where the arguments are all monopolistic but the reality is user annoyance.


Yeah, I mean, in the last year every search engine, every browser, every SaaS app I have to use for work... They have all compromised their UX to put a chat bot front-end-centre. And in the majority of cases, that chat bot doesn't seem to enable any new use-cases. It's just bandwagoning...




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: