That report looked credible until the apparently serious claim "Elsewhere, he raises concerns that a unit of rogue LGBT+ reporters is censoring coverage of the trans debate".
Which was such a deranged claim to go without any substantiation, evidence or further sources, that I loved again at the publisher and remembered why nobody takes Telegraph stories seriously.
what you wrote, can be equally applied to BBC with reports that reference "gaza health ministry" as source of truth without any substantiation, evidence or further sources
Which was such a deranged claim to go without any substantiation, evidence or further sources, that I loved again at the publisher and remembered why nobody takes Telegraph stories seriously.