The founders of the hypothetical terrorist vegan organization called "Blow Up Meat Packing Plants and Everyone Inside" has a lot to like about your proposal.
How do you see the incentives playing out in your multi-round game-theory battle for information control?
If it's wrong about something that 95+ percent of people are wrong about, that's mildly annoying but understandable.
If it picks sides on something that half of people are wrong about, that's less understandable of an error. Even if by chance it happens to pick the side that I know is right.
How do you see the incentives playing out in your multi-round game-theory battle for information control?