How is reading different from doing. This is about encouraging children to read, it’s a very active process. Maybe I‘m missing something?

Just to argue reading vs doing: I know lots of heavy readers who can't absolutely do something new. They only read and read.

On the other hand, doing is a totally different skillset.

I'm not against reading just that it's very unlike doing something in general.

What does doing even mean here? Cutting the grass? Building a tree house?

No need to be black and white.

Reading can be active, if I'm taking notes on nonfiction its a somewhat active process.

Reading can be passive, if I'm cruising on a fiction book.

It is doing, but it's doing one thing: reading. Encouraging kids to read makes sense for building literacy and encouraging imagination, but there's a point where enough is enough, reading the 6th installment of Harry Potter is for entertainment, and they're better off riding a bike, building something, and making friends.

It's the same for adults. We blindly praise reading, but much of it belongs on the shelf at an airport bookstore, it's not particularly challenging or informing, and it might as well be video games or TV.

Doing what? Just whatever? As long as they aren't doing any reading?

They should also replace lunch period with a "life" period. I see a lot of kids sitting around eating, getting fat, but kids need experience in real life; eating will get them nowhere.

Reading is doing when it involves active engagement - kids who read deeply are processing, imagining, questioning, and building mental models they later apply to real-world problems.

How do you propose that should look?

The whole show is to motivate people to want to pick up a book, which to me sounds like an emphasis on doing.

If you’d replace this with posters or shows that just say “READ A BOOK”, it would not be as effective.

porque no los dos?