Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

So your argument is that if an extension could block even a single ad with MV3, it means that ad blockers function properly in MV3? Do you not agree that "properly" means "having all the functionality they had with MV2"?


> Do you not agree that "properly" means "having all the functionality they had with MV2"?

Of course it doesn't, if MV2 provided a bunch of edge case stuff that doesn't matter for normal adblocking.

> So your argument is that if an extension could block even a single ad with MV3

That's a silly thing to say. No, it's that if it's blocking 99.9+% of ads it should definitely be considered to be functioning properly. Which uBOL definitely is.

Quibbling over whether it blocks 99.999% or 99.99999% is not relevant to whether it functions "properly". It clearly does.


You're making up numbers as bad as the person's you're responding to. My made up numbers are more like 98% for uBlock Origin and 95% for Lite, and Origin is maintaining that number while Lite is losing about a point ever couple of months. My expectation is that in a few years, Lite will be not only deficient, but entirely failing to meet expectations of the full version users. For me, it's already getting close.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: