Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Perhaps. Rationalists are also known for updating[changing] their beliefs. They do this under the guise of "doing" Bayesian reasoning. It may be that susceptibility to cults is an edge case of this meta-congnitive position. Or in other words, stubbornness of beliefs may be a defense mechanism against cults.


They are known for “updating” their beliefs to crazy things, and discounting evidence in front of their face based on abstract arguments.


let's stigmatize admitting when you were wrong. never changing your mind is the only way to avoid joining a murder cult!


Pointing out a tradeoff isn’t the same as arguing for the other extreme. That’s splitting[1], a well-documented cognitive distortion. A bit of therapy can be great for catching these patterns—sharpening your reasoning toolkit, so to speak.

1. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Splitting_(psychology)


At the same time, if psychological research proves there's a class of people who are only prevented from joining a murder cult by their unthinking devotion towards conformist beliefs, would you be surprised?


That’s what “rationalist” should mean. It is not what they do in practice.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: