Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Because it doesn't make a lot of sense to invest heavily into saving 100kg on the frame and then adding a 500kg battery. The i3 had a small, lighter battery and an extender.


If your frame is 100kg lighter doesn’t that mean you can get even better mileage out of your battery? Or, for the same weight, fit even more battery?


The range killer is really drag, not weight. Weight contributes, but at high speed drag is such a large draw that nearly nothing else matters.

The rolling resistance coefficent of a car tire is about 0.01 and the force grows linearly with mass. Drag is v^2 and the coefficients are more like 0.2 - 0.3 of the frontal area on most EVs.

Weight savings don't offer that much range savings so there isn't much incentive to pull weight out of a design, especially when carbon fibre tub construction is so much more expensive.

BMW made a bet batteries would remain very scarce and expensive, a bet they lost pretty throughly.


Yes, but is it cost-effective? Will the customer buy it?




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: