Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

They did that with specification like "use red clay from this village" with "charcoal from that city" in this furnace.

It is not scalable, but the quality is quite stable across batches



And then you have the rebar-free Roman lime-pozzolan concrete used in the Pantheon, still standing after 2000 years.


Not a civil engineer but it sounds like the Romans knew much better then "baked red clay strong".

> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pantheon,_Rome#Structure

> The stresses in the dome were found to be substantially reduced by the use of successively less dense aggregate stones, such as small pots or pieces of pumice, in higher layers of the dome. Mark and Hutchison estimated that, if normal weight concrete had been used throughout, the stresses in the arch would have been some 80% greater. Hidden chambers engineered within the rotunda form a sophisticated structural system.[55] This reduced the weight of the roof, as did the oculus eliminating the apex.

That said, I'm guessing the Pantheon is in one piece (unlike the coliseum) because it's been used as a church for the past ~1600 years and presumably (similar to Notre Dame) it gets repair as-needed.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: