Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

I'm not sure. My suspicion is that the fundamental issue with frameworks like LangChain is that the problem domain they are attempting to solve is a proper subset of the problems that LLMs also solve.

Good code abstractions make code more tractable, tending towards natural language as they get better. But LLMs are already at the natural language level. How can you usefully abstract that further?

I think there are plenty of LLM utilities to be made- libraries for calling models, setting parameters, templating prompts, etc. But I think anything that ultimately hides prompts behind code will create more friction than not.



Glad to hear that- sounds like I should give LangGraph a try after all


would love any feedback if you do!


totally agree on not hiding prompts, and have tried to stop doing that as much as possible in LangChain and are not doing that at all in LangGraph

thanks for the thoughts, appreciate it




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: