Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

you didnt answer the question about what "the damage" is. It is a simple question.

Instead, you evaded it and tried to redirect the topic.



I already explained what I meant by damage. Being unable to see how the freedom of a tiny minority shouldn't trump the freedom of basic modes of being of the vast majority, that's damage.


What are "freedoms of basic modes of being"?

Is there a lexicon guide I should be referencing with definitions to these vague phrases.


The use of the land is removed from the people


So the damage is opportunity loss. What makes it a legitimate grievance opposed to a bogus one?

There are lots things that were once possible, but no longer are.

Of course, there is also the question of who "the people" are.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: