Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

It really shouldn't, considering they have a rule about not using primary sources.


Yes, they explicitly classify wikipedia as a tertiary source [1].

Wikipedia is good for finding secondary source, and then primary sources by following the links.

[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Primary_Secondary_an...




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: