You think that it is knee-jerk hyperbole because you
do not take account to the user the risk of using
the service.
The risk means that even if Google provides the
service free, it still can have a cost for the
user that can be very high depending on the
importance of the emails the user is locked out of.
It also means that the cost is invisible 99% of
the time, which is why people keep using Google
services. After all, most companies that offer
network services mitigate the risk for the
user by allowing the user to contact them for
help if things go wrong.
For example, Amazon Web Services and Microsoft
both allow you to purchase support. However,
Google seem to only provide support when they
decide to invite you to it.
In my personal case, my main email of 16 years
is becoming increasingly spammed. I needed to
find another email to migrate to, and decided
to try out Gmail. Gmail has failed my evaluation.
The risk means that even if Google provides the service free, it still can have a cost for the user that can be very high depending on the importance of the emails the user is locked out of.
It also means that the cost is invisible 99% of the time, which is why people keep using Google services. After all, most companies that offer network services mitigate the risk for the user by allowing the user to contact them for help if things go wrong.
For example, Amazon Web Services and Microsoft both allow you to purchase support. However, Google seem to only provide support when they decide to invite you to it.
In my personal case, my main email of 16 years is becoming increasingly spammed. I needed to find another email to migrate to, and decided to try out Gmail. Gmail has failed my evaluation.