Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

I'm the creator of LiveScript (http://gkz.github.com/LiveScript/) which is on that list. Feel free to ask any questions! LiveScript has unnested callbacks, paren free chaining, function composition and piping operators, proper list comprehensions, and a lot of other improvements over CoffeeScript.


Why fork (and reverse half of Coco's semantics), instead of contributing to Coco?

Do you expect that any of your additions will get merged into mainline Coco/CoffeeScript?


Most of my changes would be unacceptable to Satyr, the maintainer of Coco. For instance, I posted an issue about creating proper list comprehensions in both CoffeeScript and Coco, and both times was shut down. That's why I decided to create my own project, and make the changes I want without being shut down all the time. I don't expect any of my changes to be merged into Coco or CoffeeScript, but if they want to then I would encourage them to do so.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: