No, the idea is that the verifier is a human-written program, like the many formal-verification tools that already exist, not an LLM. There is zero reason to make this an LLM.
It makes sense to use LLMs for the decompilation and the proof generation, because both arguably require creativity, but a mere proof verifier requires zero creativity, only correctness.
It makes sense to use LLMs for the decompilation and the proof generation, because both arguably require creativity, but a mere proof verifier requires zero creativity, only correctness.