Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

You're asking a hypothetical that can't be answered, but it's based on the (very faulty, imo) premise that a world without Stallman would not have any free software. Open source was (and would be) alive and well without him.


>Open source was (and would be) alive and well without him.

You're making a assertion with no evidence or argument, and using it as a premise to dismiss a rhetorical question.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: