> You seem keen to promote this, as you posted the same reply twice.
The same point has been made twice, so the response is identical..?
> "It's a PPA but for Fedora instead of Ubuntu."
So I'm not sure the analogy holds 100%.
I, as a software developer, want to distribute my SW. I use COPR to build RPMs that run on any RPM-based distro, e.g. openSUSE, Fedora, RHEL, CentOS, ...
You, as the consumer, can enable the COPR repository and consume my packages (or you can manually download the RPMs if you prefer).
> OSB builds anything for any OS. It's basically a free public CI/CD server, and it's platform-neutral.
That is indeed different. Thank you, I might take a look at OSB.
The same point has been made twice, so the response is identical..?
> "It's a PPA but for Fedora instead of Ubuntu."
So I'm not sure the analogy holds 100%.
I, as a software developer, want to distribute my SW. I use COPR to build RPMs that run on any RPM-based distro, e.g. openSUSE, Fedora, RHEL, CentOS, ...
You, as the consumer, can enable the COPR repository and consume my packages (or you can manually download the RPMs if you prefer).
> OSB builds anything for any OS. It's basically a free public CI/CD server, and it's platform-neutral.
That is indeed different. Thank you, I might take a look at OSB.