Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

> a premature preprint

Considering how that preprint has sparked interest in other research institutions and multiplied the resources allocated to the problem, I would say this publication was not premature, it's most other research results that are late.



The paper was leaked early. The team wanted more time to get more attempts at producing it and improving their yield. The paper also wasn't generally up to their writing standards. It's essentially an early draft that was leaked.


It looks like this worked in this material for years, perhaps the would have taken a few more years.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: