Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

What? This makes no sense. If fossil fuels are important, we should be saving it for where it is needed.


That would be rather logical now, wouldn't it? However, I'm afraid that when someone says that we must reduce our dependence on petrochemicals I must mention that there are things for which we have no replacement for petrochemicals. I must argue that eliminating petrochemical use is impossible any time you ask to reduce use. I don't make the rules.

Would you like to hear about how some Americans need a truck to do work too? Just go ahead and mention that we should aim to use smaller vehicles.


I agree. petrochemicals are very useful, so we should not be burning it all up. It takes millions of years to produce organically.


Yup, that's why I can't give up my truck.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: