I think a more favourable interpretation is “Taste is multidimensional and complex but to show it exists it is sufficient to show it exists for the simplest to prove dimension. Technical talent is that least subjective dimension. Argument follows.”
Appreciate this read. However, doesn't the result in this case end up being trivial? "No matter how complex the subject, I can find a part we all agree on." That's great, but it doesn't prove a meaningful notion of agreement about the whole, and I missed any argument that it could.
