Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

>In many cases, what you're working on doesn't have an answer on the internet.

>That usually means the problem is hard or important, or both.

Really ? If a problem is important someone likely already tackled it. I mean 15 years ago this was less likely, but these days there's so much work in the open and search is very good, when I find there aren't any references for my problem it usually means I misinterpreted the problem or I'm doing something very niche.



You're implying the reverse causation. The reflection is "can't find answer" -> "might be hard", not "might be hard" -> "can't find answer".

Surely there is copius documentation on a significant number of hard problems.


When you get above the 40th percentile in problem difficulty or novelty, there are no answers or even discussions on the internet.


I feel like your argument is a little along the line of: “ Everything that can be Invented has been Invented”


No, just that CS/programming is mature enough that important stuff has already been explored so if I'm hitting a dead end either I'm doing something very specific that hasn't been investigated yet or (more likely) I'm not framing the problem correctly.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: