> And you can thank the previous guy in charge for setting this precedent, that you can do whatever you want via Executive Order. I have little sympathy here.
What is this argument? Why is it always “look at what Obama did! Therefore it’s ok!” when Trump does something bad?
I'm making an argument that Executive Order abuse is bad, but for whatever reason we're only worried about it now. When the guy in charge isn't the usual kind of ... uh ... President. If you want me to say it George W. Bush's EO abuses were also bad.
What is this argument? Why is it always “look at what Obama did! Therefore it’s ok!” when Trump does something bad?