Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

How about instead of pushing water up into the air, you pulled air down into the water. Build a big floating object at sea and drag it down into the water with a cable attached to a motor/generator.


I think you would have to use a vessel that could withstand underwater pressures. I imagine that would be on the expensive side, probably more expensive than the concrete blocks. And if the the vessel compresses at all, I think you loose efficiency due to the loss of buoyancy.

On a more general note, I think the issue with these novel storage methods is that even their more optimistic $/kWh targets are barely competitive with existing battery prices. And due to manufacturing scale, battery prices are expected to continue to decline. A similar thing happened in the solar market. Prices were really high, which led to a bunch of startups attempting to bring novel technologies to market (Solyndra was one of them), but once China started flexing its manufacturing muscle, PV prices dropped and the novel technologies had no hope of competing.


That's really clever. Only real downside is underwater maintenance is a PITA.

Although I suspect for the quantities involved, it still may be impractical.


Several similar approaches have been tested, although they use a turbine rather a moving chain to generate energy: http://euanmearns.com/a-review-of-underwater-compressed-air-....


Here's a patent for a system like that: https://patents.google.com/patent/US20100107627




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: