Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

I’m deeply offended by the commenters questioning the authenticity of this guy’s bio. The poor man lived and died essentially an outcast and alone.


Why is it offensive to ask if specific and extraordinary claims have ever been verified in controlled conditions? I also don't see how this has any relation on Kim living as a lonely outcast.


Because offended is the new black.


You're offended. Says more about you.

Why would it even be offensive at all (but especially to you) to question the veracity of facts in a Wikipedia article?




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: