This appears to only affect small shipments, so like one USB cable from China would no longer be subsidized if mailed from China. But in reality if it's cheaper to buy a warehouse here in the US and drop ship from that you may not see much of a difference in cost.
China would need to use their foreign reserve to do this subsidy. Ignoring belt and road all of China's internal industry subsidies use Yaun. Belt and Road use dollars but are "lent" thus in theory China is not reducing its foreign reserve.
Problem for China as we see in their capital controls is maintaining wealth in Yaun. Any subsidy which requires using foreign dollars, as paying the US postal tarrif would, weakens the states stability.
Not sure why you're being downvoted; that's a perfectly reasonable prediction. If shipping costs start reducing shipments of goods to the US by any appreciable amount, and the Chinese government wants to offset that, a subsidy is a reasonable way for them to do it. And I'd much rather the Chinese government subsidize their citizen's postage than the US government doing it for them.