Although Warp doesn't mask IP addresses, it should be useful for these two use cases:
1) Communicating with insecure websites (HTTP instead of HTTPS)
2) Using unsecured wireless networks (e.g. Wi-Fi at a coffee shop)
Beyond these two cases, is there any advantage to using Warp? Does Warp provide any benefits for email (secure IMAP/SMTP), file sharing (BitTorrent), or other protocols?
Statistics from one of my websites running Argo show a 16.73% percent improvement for 32.3% of web traffic routed through Argo.
For my Google Cloud Washington based server, I see 5-15% improvement for some traffic from the EU and US East Coast and 15-30% improvement some traffic from Asia, Africa, and South America. (all according to CF statistics)
What's the actual vulnerability when simply using an unsecured wireless network? Sure, it's easy for them to MitM you if you're using http, but if you're only using https, what's the harm?
DNS queries and the unencrypted parts of the HTTPS protocol (like SNI without recent enhancements). So passive sniffers can at least see what sites you're visiting.
Thanks, this should have been obvious in hindsight.
One more for people with cell phone plans that don't adhere to net neutrality: Warp can probably bypass quality caps on video streaming.
Traditional VPNs are strictly better than Warp+, as far as I can see, but the free version of Warp is a generous offering for users who would otherwise not be using a VPN.
> Warp and Warp+ will not route traffic data from your device through the Cloudflare network for certain Internet properties, such as over-the-top content provider websites, as determined by Cloudflare in its sole discretion.
> WARP is not designed to allow you to access geo-restricted content when you’re traveling. It will not hide your IP address from the websites you visit.
I think that's because Warp doesn't let you select the location of the server you're connecting to. Almost all VPN services have servers in different areas, and you can choose which geographic area you want an IP address from. In contrast, Warp only lets you connect to a server that's close to you.
Based on speed tests, it doesn't look like Warp is bypassed for video content.
That’s not the same thing - they could provide your IP to the site you visit in an added header or something without compromising your privacy from your ISP. That doesn’t imply they aren’t routing traffic to some websites.
1) Communicating with insecure websites (HTTP instead of HTTPS)
2) Using unsecured wireless networks (e.g. Wi-Fi at a coffee shop)
Beyond these two cases, is there any advantage to using Warp? Does Warp provide any benefits for email (secure IMAP/SMTP), file sharing (BitTorrent), or other protocols?