I've considered this in the past. Though I have nothing to back this up, I very much doubt it.
1. Math and programming are limited in their use - they are never primarily used communicate with other people. They are more like an expansion pack some people add to their language.
2. Language itself is more like a programming language for the brain: Without it, one's development suffers (this is why deaf folks were considered stupid in the past).
3. Math and programming languages require tools that are still developing when people are young. We take years teaching basic maths, for example. People have to be able to grasp the confines of programming languages - which are more strict than spoken language. Children really benefit from having the physical ability to type (for programming) as well.
1. Math and programming are limited in their use - they are never primarily used communicate with other people. They are more like an expansion pack some people add to their language.
2. Language itself is more like a programming language for the brain: Without it, one's development suffers (this is why deaf folks were considered stupid in the past).
3. Math and programming languages require tools that are still developing when people are young. We take years teaching basic maths, for example. People have to be able to grasp the confines of programming languages - which are more strict than spoken language. Children really benefit from having the physical ability to type (for programming) as well.