Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

You can argue intent all you want (and btw no one has described the employee as a whistle-blower)

However, as a matter of fact, Sprint's exaggeration (claiming that sales were around 3 times as much as they really were) was exposed by what that employee did.



>> btw no one has described the employee as a whistle-blower

"publicly exposed exaggerated Android EVO sales numbers" reads like he is a whistle blower. and it doesn't express what really happend.

I totally agree to your second point.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: