Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

It's a rocket to Mars. That's always cool.

However, there is a big difference in sending a rocket to Mars with 2015 technology vs. 1960's technology in terms of cost, reliability, materials, etc.



I am confused as to why you are bringing up 1960's technology? I don't see any comparisons anywhere to the original NASA programs of the sixties.


By implication. Quoting:

"Only 40 percent of missions sent to Mars by major space organizations — NASA, Russia’s, Japan’s, or China’s — had ever been a success. No space organization had entered Mars’s orbit on its first attempt."

Those first attempts were all on quite a bit older technology.

Don't get me wrong, the engineering is still really hard. And the sensor technology is cutting edge. But the breathless marketing prose could use some toning down.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: