Huh, so are you implying that hyper should stay synchronous so that it doesn't appear to just be copying things from 40 years ago?! This comment sounds like you think that it was good back then, but now you don't know what to think of a library that is aiming to switch to asynchronous IO and/or don't know why it's a good thing?

(It's also not like the comment you're replying to said that async IO is a recent invention, your low-effort sarcasm as a response is unfortunate.)