Thank you for reading it. My choice of quote wasn't the best, as i am not equipped to interpret the fine details correctly in entirety. However i am happy that my overall disagreement is shared.
And i agree, that while more subtle, the points you pointed out represent a far further reaching and far more dangerous misunderstanding of the purpose of law.
There are in my opinion many details like this that many voters were not aware of, either through deception, omission or just plain lack of time to research. And to be sure, there will be such details about Clinton.
However, on balance, i am confident that Trump and the people he surrounds himself with represent a much bigger danger to the lifelihood and health of innocent people than Clinton would've been, if only because the fact that such things are said publicly indicate that restraint is not something they bother with even for appearances.
And i agree, that while more subtle, the points you pointed out represent a far further reaching and far more dangerous misunderstanding of the purpose of law.
There are in my opinion many details like this that many voters were not aware of, either through deception, omission or just plain lack of time to research. And to be sure, there will be such details about Clinton.
However, on balance, i am confident that Trump and the people he surrounds himself with represent a much bigger danger to the lifelihood and health of innocent people than Clinton would've been, if only because the fact that such things are said publicly indicate that restraint is not something they bother with even for appearances.