I see, so does that mean it potentially would be required to explicitly support ... | Hacker News

Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit

		cm3 on June 20, 2016 \| parent \| context \| favorite \| on: Afl.rs: Fuzzing Rust code with american-fuzzy-lop I see, so does that mean it potentially would be required to explicitly support other code generators (GHC, OCaml, or something else), assuming the existing instrumentation is insufficient?

masklinn on June 20, 2016 [–]

I think so, when using an unsupported codegen backend you'd need to add guided fuzzing support.

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact