Not necessarily.. if people start to get sick, who has the liability. Jack in the Box had bad food practices and it killed a bunch of people. Same idea here.
That is kind of early-90s Seattle (4 kids died, was working for McDonalds at the time), has Jack in the Box killed a bunch more people more recently that you are referring to?
No but this is why In&Out wants to control/restrict delivery, to prevent people getting sick and suing them. Delivery guy could have Shigella or something, handles your food (eats a fry say) and you get sick. You blame In&Out. In fact he delivers 100 In&Outs all ordered from same place. Delivery guy is the vector but In&Out gets the blame.
If it had, it would totally have been in the news. That I knew what parent was talking about exactly goes to show that they don't happen that often. I'm not really a fan of Jack in the Box, but 1993 is when I graduated HS, for crying out loud.
> if people start to get sick, who has the liability
The sick people, clearly. Just like the dead people who went to Jack in the Box. Exactly what kind of restitution are you proposing here? A pimped out grave?
