Eh, yes and no. Python at least has `elif` statements.
When execution control depends on the order of nested arguments, I find "c" style to really enhance the following contrived example, even with rainbow parens:
(if true
(whatever this is an (example
that is (kind of hard)
(-> to
(read %))))
(this is an ELSE but hard to figure out))
When it comes to if/else and if you indent with some sanity, then lisp is like Python: if the 'else' branch is too hard to spot or if you forget the context by the time you reach the 'else', then your 'if' branch is simply too many lines long. Or you should flip the condition so that the short branch comes first.
Meanwhile, I can't even write your lisp example as-is in any of the editors I tried it in.
Lisp, has cond which is analagous to Python's elif
Also you have your indentation wrong; (this is an ELSE but hard to figur eout) should be one column to the left, which makes it significantly more readable.
When execution control depends on the order of nested arguments, I find "c" style to really enhance the following contrived example, even with rainbow parens: