Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Do you think that maximizing expected utility in general is not how a rational person should act? If yes, how do you deal with https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Von_Neumann%E2%80%93Morgenster...?


On of the failings of decision theory is our 'utility functions' are not necessarily static. The most obvious case being people don't necessarily order the same thing every time they go to a restaurant.

Arguably you could model this with hidden variables. So: A mathematician might go to vegas and spend 1,000$ gamboling with the expectation that they will lose that money. With novelty being the reason that becomes a reasonable trade-off.

In that context maximizing expected utility becomes hard because you can't accurately model your utility function.


Expected utility is great, expected money is silly.


I don't think that's enough to solve this problem. If you replace money by utility, it seems like it would still be a paradox.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: