Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | zemariagp's commentslogin

Wait till you hear about the Keen Kubernetes Knowledge iniciative


North American Zigbee Initiative


Was it written in PHP?


Good time to reflect on Ross Ulbright’s 2xLife sentence


One life sentence and that was based largely on him paying to have five people murdered.


Two life sentences for charges that had nothing to do with the alleged murder-for-hire. Those charges were dropped. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ross_Ulbricht#Trial


The judge can take into consideration during sentencing conduct not explicitly charged. Heck they can take into consideration things you have been acquitted over by a jury too.

That is right (I'm telling you how the law is, not how it should be) A jury can decide that it was not proven beyond a reasonable doubt that you did something and yet you can still receiver a heavier sentence for it. (as long as they don't acquit you over all charges.)


only one life sentence plus $183,961,921: https://www.ice.gov/news/releases/ross-ulbricht-aka-dread-pi...


https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2015/may/29/silk-road...

>The 31-year-old physics graduate and former boy scout was handed five sentences: one for 20 years, one for 15 years, one for five and two for life.

I can't find the actual court documents, but I personally find a report from someone presumably at the trial more trustworthy than a government press release.

edit did find the transcripts, https://www.scribd.com/doc/283722300/Ross-Ulbricht-Sentencin...

>that on Counts Two and Four you are sentenced to a period of life imprisonment to run concurrently


[flagged]


Not sure you should get a lighter sentence because you tried to murder someone and failed.


In most jurisdictions, though, you do. Attempted murder does not get the same punishment that murder does. Though I agree with the premise that it should get substantially similar punishment. Successful murder should get a bit more due to the consequences.


Am I wrong in thinking that a paper that is truly alarming in finding deception will never exists because there was… deception?


This has to be a troll


container queries dude


Yes, it’s a central part of our stack so I guess this one I can’t talk about, thanks anyway!


Hah, when a technology is so good you can't evangelize it because everyone already uses it...


Someone call Moderna. They filed the patent so I’m sure they will clarify


I though this claim was BS but indeed you're right.

https://patents.google.com/patent/US9587003B2/en


Someone call Moderna, they filed the patent so I’m sure they will clarify


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: